#storylab

After reading about the Washington Post's Coffee House Newsroom experiment this morning, I decided to stop by and give J. Freedom duLac a visit. We chatted for a while about the university and journalism, and of course, Twitter came up.

I've had a love-hate relationship with the social media tool ever since I left last year's NewsVision conference feeling like not having a Twitter account doomed me to journalistic failure. (I caved and joined the next day.)

I agree that's Twitter's great for connecting people, finding cool links and breaking down the lines of corporate communication to, for example, unload on someone about the lack of power in your house.

I followed the #storylab tweets all day but felt like I was eavesdropping. Yes, people post this information publicly, so an expectation of privacy is absurd. But it was odd and surreal to see reporters joking back and forth and editors counting down the hours to deadline. I felt like I was in the newsroom with them, which is ironic considering none of the reporters were even in the newsroom.

Nevertheless, my inner pendulum is slowly swinging toward online re-engagement. I might give Twitter another shot. This evening I told my brother I'm thinking about getting an iPhone soon.

At least it's not an äppärät.

State Department Panel: "Human Rights Advocacy 101"

Idealists, consider yourselves warned. Addressing human rights issues may be the right thing to do, but that logic alone won’t convince any government to act.

Leaders of three prominent human rights organizations and a State Department official gathered with about two dozen students at town hall meeting Monday where they emphasized the importance of framing human rights as a central component of national and economic security, rather than a stand-alone issue.

Human rights advocates keep their eyes on a clear objective but must also remain cognizant of the “political dynamic,” said Elisa Massimino, president and CEO of Human Rights First. “Don’t change the goalposts, but you may have to change the plays,” she said.

Human rights organizations bring public pressure to issues, forcing the government to address them, said Tom Malinowski, Washington advocacy director for Human Rights Watch. And as newspapers and their foreign coverage continue to decline, these organizations are often the only ones monitoring conflicts where human rights are being exploited or denied, he said.

National debates over detainee abuse and civilian trials of suspected terrorists that have intensified over the past two years show the world we’re prepared to consider what our laws really mean, said Michael Posner, assistant secretary for democracy, human rights and labor.

It matters who gives voice to such issues. For example, when Gen. Stanley McChrystal takes steps to reduce civilian casualties, and retired military leaders speak out against torture, the link between human rights and national security becomes clearer.

However, “you don’t push hard enough that you disempower those in government,” said Jennifer Windsor, executive director of Freedom House. Rather, you continue to show stakeholders, including those in the private sector, that advancing human rights does not contradict motivations.

The panel discussed the Global Network Initiative, a coalition of private information and communication technology companies (including Google, Microsoft and Yahoo!), nongovernmental organizations and academic institutions dedicated to protecting the freedom of expression. Something like the GNI elucidates to for-profit organizations their role as “a linchpin to this idea of American foreign policy,” Massimino said.

The session did not focus on a specific category within human rights; it gave the students a mental framework with which to approach the issues.